Vision Communications Reality Check
A few weeks ago on these E-pages, I wrote about the difference between vision, mission and perspective, and why I increasingly believe perspective is the most honest of the three. After the piece was published, a few readers called. Some agreed with the argument. Some pushed back, especially on vision. They felt vision by definition cannot be too precise. That conversation stayed with me. This piece grows out of that exchange and a longer career spent watching how vision is communicated, sold, defended, and sometimes quietly recycled. In theory, Vision Communications exists to explain where an organisation is headed and why. At its best, it provides direction and reassurance. It helps people make sense of change and reduces uncertainty. Those are legitimate communication goals. Anyone who has worked in PR or corporate communications knows that calm is often as important as clarity. The problem starts when reassurance becomes a substitute for thinking. In many organisations, especially ...